Congressman Mauricio Rivera, a former member of the ruling Libertad y Refundación (LIBRE) party, has launched an accusation that has ignited public debate by claiming that the party resorts to esoteric practices such as witchcraft, Santería, and occultism to maintain its political power. The statements come amid institutional tension, marked by the approaching general elections and growing mistrust between political actors and citizens.
Public denunciation and content of the accusations
Rivera made his statements on social media and in the press, asserting that LIBRE “has always resorted to Santería, witchcraft, sorcery, and the occult to achieve its goals.” The congressman maintained that these practices are part of a parallel strategy aimed at influencing institutional decisions and maintaining control of the state apparatus.
According to Rivera, these actions respond to a logic of power that transcends the democratic process, and he called on citizens to remain vigilant against what he described as “shady maneuvers.” Although he did not present concrete evidence, his statements add to a series of criticisms he has made since distancing himself from the ruling party.
Governmental and societal responses
Rivera’s statements spread quickly on social media, generating mixed reactions in both political circles and among the general public. LIBRE has not issued a formal institutional response, although grassroots members and supporters have rejected the accusations, calling them unfounded and part of a smear campaign against the ruling party.
Analysts and civil society organizations have expressed concern about the impact of such allegations on the political climate, warning that, even if they lack verifiable evidence, they could deepen polarization and further erode trust in democratic institutions.
A tense pre-election climate
Rivera’s claim arises during a period characterized by numerous indicators of political unrest. The nation is experiencing reciprocal allegations of corruption, claims of vote tampering, and an increasing influence of groups associated with the governing party in areas where public decisions are made.
This episode adds to a string of controversies that include conflicts between branches of government, legislative blockages, and questions about the role of security forces in political processes. In this context, the mention of esoteric elements introduces a symbolic and cultural component that, regardless of its veracity, exacerbates the perception of opacity in the exercise of power.
Challenges for democratic institutions
The controversy generated by Rivera’s statements highlights the challenges facing Honduras in terms of governance and institutional credibility. In the midst of an early election campaign and a citizenry increasingly distrustful of political actors, events such as this reflect the fragility of public debate and the risk that confrontation will replace political dialogue.
Sin inclinarse a favor o en contra de la validez de las declaraciones, lo cierto es que sus repercusiones revelan la necesidad de reforzar los canales institucionales, fomentar un ambiente de respeto entre los sectores en disputa y garantizar procesos transparentes de cara a las próximas elecciones generales.