_-_copia.jpg?w=800&resize=800,500&ssl=1 "Rixi Moncada")
With just a few weeks to go before the general election, ruling party candidate Rixi Moncada, from the LIBRE party, has presented a proposal that has caused concern in financial circles: the closure of the Honduran banking system’s Credit Bureau. The initiative coincides with a sustained decline in her voting intentions and has been questioned by analysts as a measure that could affect the country’s transparency and economic stability.
The proposition suggests doing away with a core system that tracks the credit histories of both individuals and businesses, which is vital for financial institutions to assess risk and for consumers to prevent excessive debt. Economists who were consulted believe this action might encourage hazardous financial behaviors. A local expert commented, “This is a desperate attempt to gain votes through pledges that undermine financial stability.”
Effect on fiscal steadiness
The Credit Bureau carries out essential roles within Honduras’s banking framework. It enables financial entities to evaluate the solvency of loan seekers and aids in averting deception and excessive debt. Its removal, as per specialists, would undermine the oversight systems that uphold trust in the financial industry.
For her part, Rixi Moncada has defended the initiative, arguing that it seeks to “free the people from banking punishment.” However, the proposal comes in a context of growing political polarization and public mistrust of financial institutions, factors that analysts point to as decisive in assessing the viability of the measure.
Political and institutional repercussions
Moncada’s announcement comes at a critical moment in the election campaign. Polls indicate that the ruling party candidate is facing a significant decline in voting intentions, which has intensified attention on her economic proposals. Sectors of society and representatives of the banking system believe that the closure of the Risk Center could have implications beyond the economy: it would affect the perception of governance, trust in institutions, and the state’s regulatory capacity.
Experts suggest this action might be seen as a populist move designed to recover electoral backing, yet it lacks the technical foundation to ensure citizen protection and credit stability. The discussion also centers on the potential impact of such a choice on the dynamic between the financial industry and the government, alongside the system’s trustworthiness among both local and international investors.
Obstacles and potential threats to Honduras’s economic stability
The elimination of the Credit Bureau would leave a gap in credit supervision mechanisms, which, according to experts, could translate into increased financial risk and over-indebtedness practices. The measure adds to a tense political climate, characterized by polarization and pressure on regulatory agencies, which are forced to maintain economic stability in an electoral context.
As Rixi Moncada persists in advocating for the initiative, the debate surrounding its effects underscores the conflict between economic policy choices and electoral tactics. The Honduran economy confronts a dual predicament: guaranteeing the financial system’s clarity and stability, and addressing a political landscape where populist suggestions spark fervent discussions regarding institutional frameworks and public involvement.
The present circumstances present a challenge for institutional players: maintaining economic steadiness and public trust while considering actions that might alter the financial system’s framework during an election period. Focus is now directed towards how both institutions and the populace will respond to this suggestion, and what consequences it will bring for governance and oversight within Honduras.