Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

How are Chinese maritime claims fueling South China Sea tensions?

https://www.lowyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/styles/interpreter_article_image/public/2024-03/GettyImages-2054048806.jpg


The South China Sea is a crucial and strategically important expanse of water that is gradually turning into a focal point of geopolitical conflict. The main source of these rising tensions is China’s strong maritime assertions, which are creating conflicts not just with adjacent nations but also with global players such as the United States. To understand the shifting dynamics in the South China Sea, it is critical to explore the root causes and the ramifications of these disagreements.


The Foundation of the Tensions

China’s claims in the South China Sea are primarily based on the so-called “Nine-Dash Line,” a demarcation line used by China to outline its territorial claims. This line stretches as far as 2,000 kilometers from the Chinese mainland and encompasses most of the South China Sea. China’s claims overlap with the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of several Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan.

Various elements support China’s maritime claims. Beijing often mentions historical assertions, referring to ancient maps and documents. Furthermore, the South China Sea is abundant in natural resources, such as large deposits of oil and natural gas, which cater to China’s increasing energy demands. Dominance over these resources offers economic advantages and energy independence.

Ecosystem of Conflict: Involving Coastal States

The Philippines, Vietnam, and Malaysia, along with other countries, have vigorously opposed China’s extensive territorial assertions. Notably, the Philippines brought the issue before an international tribunal in The Hague in 2016, leading to a judgment that nullified significant portions of China’s broad claims. Nonetheless, China dismissed the verdict, maintaining its position on sovereignty.

For Vietnam, the dispute is deeply nationalistic. The frequent encounters between Vietnamese vessels and Chinese maritime law enforcement underscore the contentious nature of these waters. The Paracel and Spratly Islands, in particular, are flashpoints for confrontation, with both nations asserting ownership.

The critical role of the South China Sea for these coastal nations is immense. Beyond its resources, the area facilitates the transit of goods valued over $3 trillion each year, establishing it as a vital sea route for international trade.

U.S. Participation and Global Consequences

Los Estados Unidos, aunque no es un reclamante en las disputas territoriales, desempeña un papel fundamental en la dinámica del Mar de China Meridional. Su interés principal es garantizar la libertad de navegación y mantener el equilibrio de poder en la región de Asia-Pacífico. A través de sus operaciones de libertad de navegación (FONOPs), la Armada de los EE. UU. patrulla rutinariamente las aguas en disputa para demostrar su compromiso con las leyes marítimas internacionales.

This engagement, nevertheless, presents its unique array of challenges. China’s expansion of military capabilities and the construction of man-made islands in the South China Sea are partly reactions to the U.S. involvement. Numerous global analysts worry that an unintended military incident might intensify tensions into a full-scale confrontation.

Examples of Cases and Latest Advances

Case studies exemplify the reality of these disputes. In 2012, the Scarborough Shoal standoff between China and the Philippines demonstrated the potential for naval confrontations to arise from what are ostensibly routine encounters at sea. More recently, in 2021, China enacted a law allowing its coast guard to fire on foreign vessels in disputed waters, a move that has alarmed neighboring states and the international community alike.

There have also been diplomatic efforts to ease tensions. ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and China have engaged in discussions aimed at producing a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea, although progress has been slow. Many analysts suggest that a legally binding agreement would be pivotal in reducing tensions and preventing potential conflicts.

Thinking about the present circumstances, the South China Sea is not merely a local conflict over small islands and waters; it is a vital hotspot where economic priorities, national pride, and military strength intersect. The path of these disputes will be determined by how the stakeholders use diplomatic efforts, global regulations, and military prevention. In the end, peace in the South China Sea depends on concessions that honor the territorial integrity and sovereign rights of each involved nation, along with a united dedication to mutual progress and stability.